Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Ketchum Advertising Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 12, 1994No. 92 Civ. 7113 (MBM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Maritza Martinez alleges that her former employer, Ketchum Advertising Company, 1 discriminated against her on the basis of sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982), and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec.Law § 291 et seq. (the “Human Rights Law” or “HRL”). Defendant moves, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), to strike plaintiffs demand for a jury trial and for compensatory and punitive damages under Title VII, and to strike plaintiffs demand for a jury trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Erhard v. Local Union No. 604District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Jackson v. Alto Experience, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2024