Legal Opinion

People v. Olken

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1981No. Crim. 39468PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COBEY, J.

We hold that a sentence imposed pursuant to a negotiated disposition which is not supported by an articulation of reasons, while erroneous, is not “unauthorized by law” and, therefore, is not subject to correction after it has become final.

Morton Z. Olken was convicted by plea of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1) and on November 11, 1979, was sentenced to state prison for the upper three-year term. He did not appeal this judgment but a full year later moved the trial court to reduce his sentence to the middle two-year term because it had failed to articulate the basis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. StanworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. CovinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. ChladCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re BlessingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API