Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Chlad

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1992No. D014686PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Gary Chlad appeals an order denying a motion to modify his sentence under Penal Code 1 section 1170, subdivision (d). 2 Chlad contends (1) the trial court had jurisdiction to resentence him under section 1170, subdivision (d) and (2) the order denying his motion is an appealable order. We dismiss the appeal.

Procedural Background

On April 23, 1990, Chlad pleaded guilty to nine counts of second degree robbery (§§211, 212.5) and using a firearm in connection with each count (§ 12022.5) under a plea bargain providing a maximum prison sentence of 19 years.

On September 11,1990,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Franklin v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. GainerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. Fuimaono, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. IbanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. GillispieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API