Legal Opinion

Warren v. Mercantile Bank of St. Louis, N.A.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1999No. ED 75378PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellants Ray and Katherine Warren (“Warrens”) filed a civil action for misrepresentation seeking monetary damages against Respondent Mercantile Bank of St. Louis (“Mercantile”). The circuit court sustained Mercantile’s motion for summary judgment. The Warrens assert that the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment on their misrepresentation claim because a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Mercantile intended to perform a promise made by William Vaughn (“Vaughn”), a Vice President for Mercantile. We find the circuit court did not have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coy R. GROGAN and John Henson, Appellees, v. Frank J. GARNER, Jr., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Around the World Importing, Inc. v. Mercantile Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Bremen Bank & Trust Co. of St. Louis v. MuskopfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Jones v. RennieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Brunig v. HumburgMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Chastain v. GearyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Sequa Corp. v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. S.S. v. C.E.P.J.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Davidson Insurance Agency, Ltd. v. West Plains R-7 School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API