Legal Opinion
Hinz v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 2, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3483PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Chief Judge.
Charles A. Hinz is seventy-two years old and is indigent. He brought this suit to contest the legality of the method of apportionment of a street assessment against his property and the constitutionality of the manner of assessment collection. From an order dismissing his amended complaint, he brings this appeal.
The City of Phoenix (City) proposed to improve certain streets within the city using the procedure set forth in A.R.S. §§ 9-671 through 9-716 for the making of general public improvements. The City Council passed its resolution of intention of the proposed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Weitz v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Henningson, Durham & Richardson v. ProchnowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Weller v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farmers Investment Co. v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- St. Mary's Hospital & Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Arizona Downs v. Turf Paradise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Bentivegna v. Powers Steel & Wire Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Property Owners Ass'n of the Highland Subdivision a Portion of USMS 769 v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.