Legal Opinion

Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided November 22, 1996No. Civil Action 1:91cv248-D-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVIDSON, District Judge.

Upon remand of this cause from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, this court again takes up the motion of the defendants for the entry of summary judgment on the plaintiffs claims. After careful consideration of the defendants’ motion and all of the submissions before the court, the undersigned finds that the motion is not well taken and shall deny it.

I. Procedural Background

The plaintiff originally filed this suit on September 11, 1991. After engaging in discovery, the parties filed with this court cross motions for summary judgment. This court…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Mroz v. City of TonawandaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
  3. Hare Ex Rel. Hare v. City of CorinthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API