Legal Opinion

Crowley v. CITY OF BURLINGAME, KANSAS

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 18, 2005No. CIV.A.04-2078-GTVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Thomas L.A. Crowleyj formerly a law enforcement officer for Defendant City of Burlingame, Kansas, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendant violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights by depriving him of a property interest in continued employment and of a liberty interest without due process of law. Plaintiff also maintains that Defendant breached ah implied contract of employment under state law.

This action is before the court on Defendant’s motion for summary, judgment (Doc. 26). For the following…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Garcia v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  2. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API