Legal Opinion

Ray v. City of Huntington

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Cabell County. Action by M. B. Ray against the City of Huntington. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

LyNch, Judge:

This review deals with a judgment against the City of Huntington for the alleged impairment of the value of a lot abutting 80 feet on Davis Street, occasioned, it is claimed, by lowering the street grade in front of it. Although the street apparently formed part of, and co-ordinated with, the general municipal street system or plan, the city did not lay it out. nor formally accept or adopt it; though the public did use it and the city exercised some control over it, as if it were a thorofare adopted for the general use of the public.

When and before plaintiff purchased the lot ih…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Folmsbee v. . City of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Sallden v. City of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Sutherland v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whitney v. Ralph Myers Contracting CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Jones v. City of ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Town of Stratford v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. City of Fairmont v. HawkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Neal v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API