Legal Opinion

Neal v. City of Bluefield

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928No. 6079PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlLLER, PRESIDENT:

Plaintiff being the owner of a lot 50 x 417 feet, a part of Lot No. 16 of the Karr and McClangherty Trustee’s Addition to the City of Bluefield, abutting on Hill Avenue, sued defendant for damages resulting thereto and to the dwelling house erected thereon by her, by the lowering of the natural grade of said street and excavating the earth in front of her property, and destroying her means of ingress and egress to and from the same, as theretofore enjoyed by her. On the trial plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for $900.00, which judgment the defendant would have us…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McGar v. Borough of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Davis v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Jones v. City of ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Harman v. BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. EdwardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Thrasher v. Amere Gas Utilities Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hollen v. LingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API