Legal Opinion

Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The substance of the complaint in this action is that the plaintiffs had contracted to purchase from a third person the cedar timber on a tract of land in the State of Washington, which was to be manufactured into shingles and paid for at the rate of ten cents per thousand shingles, with the right to enter upon the land and set up machinery thereon for the purpose of such manufacture; that they had established on the land their machinery, the same being portable personal property; had engaged in the manufacture of shingles; had felled a large number of trees; cut them into logs for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenwald v. Oregon City Transp. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Theiler v. Tillamook CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Aune v. Austin-Williams Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Enco, Inc. v. F. C. Russell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pearson v. ButtsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. S-Creek Ranch, Inc. v. Monier & CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API