Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1923No. 7746Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

The caption to the transcript fails to show when court convened or adjourned. The assistant attorney general has filed a motion asking the dismissal of the appeals because of such omission. The motion must be sustained. - (See Lowrey v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 311, 244 S. W. Rep., 147; Mendosa v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. Rep., 84, 225 S. W. Rep., 169; Davis v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. Rep., 183, 225 S. W. Rep., 532.)

We find in the record a statement of facts signed by the attorneys and approved by the trial judge, on March 4th, 1923, but it is nowhere made to appear that it was ever…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Mandosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API