Legal Opinion
Boroian v. Mueller
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 12, 2010No. 09-1630PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
In United States v. Weikert, 504 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir.2007), we rejected a supervised releasee’s Fourth Amendment challenge to the statutory requirement that he submit a blood sample for purposes of creating a DNA profile and entering it into a centralized government database. Applying a totality of the circumstances test, we concluded that the extraction of a blood sample and creation of a DNA profile from an individual on supervised release were not unreasonable searches under the Fourth Amendment. In this case, appellant Martin Boroian poses a question left unanswered in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Earl DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Massachusetts v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- United States v. BernacetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.