Legal Opinion

Rao v. Noferi

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 24, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

An attorney has the implied authority to incur and is entitled to be reimbursed for such reasonable expenditures as the diligent prosecution or defense of the lawsuit may require (Badger v. Celler, 41 App. Div. 599; Regis Radio Corp. v. American Employers Ins. Co., 30 Misc 2d 341; Matter of Lessig, 165 Misc. 706). However, such disbursements are not deemed to include expenditures which are a necessary part or adjunct of a properly equipped lawyer’s office (Matter of Lessig, supra.)

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, motion for summary judgment granted and case remitted to the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LessigNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. Badger v. CellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Regis Radio Corp. v. American Employers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API