Legal Opinion

Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 28, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0595PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 This ease presents the question whether A.R.S. 12-341.01(A) authorizes the award of attorneys fees to the prevailing party in actions for breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent conveyance, and accounting. We conclude that such claims are based on duties imposed by law, not by express or implied promises, and therefore do not “aris[e] out of a contract” within the meaning of the statute. Accordingly, we vacate the superior courts award of fees.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 In the late 1980s, Michael Dooley (“Plaintiff’) joined with Michael Fencl, William O’Brien and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. 10k LLC v. Wvsv HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. BRPS LLC v. Tenney Realty Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Beson v. USA Quality Staffing IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  5. Creative Power Solutions v. Energy Services GroupDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API