Legal Opinion
Town of Otis v. Derr
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 31, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Jesse Derr appeals from the Superior Court’s order, (Hancock County, Mead, C.J.), vacating a District Court judgment, (Ellsworth, Murray, J.), finding him not in violation of the Town of Otis Zoning Ordinance. Derr argues that we should hear this interlocutory appeal for reasons of judicial economy. We disagree and dismiss the appeal.
[¶ 2] With few exceptions, 1 we decline to hear interlocutory appeals. Millett v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 2000 ME 178, ¶ 8, 760 A.2d 250, 253. Furthermore, we have held that appeals from Superior Court remand orders are interlocutory and “should not be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Wheeler v. Maine Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Millett v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Munsey v. GrovesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Forest Ecology Network v. Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Doggett v. Town of GouldsboroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Bruesewitz v. GrantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Liberty v. BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Austin v. Universal Cheerleaders Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.