Bruesewitz v. Grant
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Mac C. Grant appeals from the District Court’s (Portland, Tucker, J.) denial of his motions to quash a disclosure subpoena, and to dismiss a disclosure proceeding. Grant concedes that the appeal is interlocutory, but argues that the case falls within an exception to the final judgment rule. We disagree and dismiss the appeal.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶2] Attorney Terry B. Bruesewitz, a Colorado resident, represented Grant, a Pennsylvania resident, in several legal matters in the 1990s. When Grant failed to pay for his services, Bruesewitz obtained a default judgment against him in Colorado for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Webb v. HaasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- United States v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Moshe Myerowitz, D.C., P.A. v. HowardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Commerce Bank and Trust Co. v. DwormanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Davis v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- In Re Estate of KingsburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Bank of New York v. RichardsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Liberty v. BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Tornesello v. TisdaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.