Legal Opinion

Klippel v. Heintz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1982No. 53,291PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

Plaintiff, B. W. Klippel, Jr., appeals from an order of the trial court sustaining a motion by the defendants for dismissal of the action due to a lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants and alternatively based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

The lawsuit grows out of the operation of two oil and gas leases located in the East Rose Field Unit in Woodson County. In 1974, the defendants purchased a 15/16ths of a 7/8ths working interest in the Bishop North lease from Equity East Oil Trust and in 1976, purchased a similar…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. Chester A. Anderson, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. Sterling v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Westerby v. Johns-Manville Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1982
  3. Pan Oil & Gas Exploration, Inc. v. Kelt Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API