Klippel v. Heintz
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Holmes, J.:
Plaintiff, B. W. Klippel, Jr., appeals from an order of the trial court sustaining a motion by the defendants for dismissal of the action due to a lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants and alternatively based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
The lawsuit grows out of the operation of two oil and gas leases located in the East Rose Field Unit in Woodson County. In 1974, the defendants purchased a 15/16ths of a 7/8ths working interest in the Bishop North lease from Equity East Oil Trust and in 1976, purchased a similar…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. Chester A. Anderson, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Sterling v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Westerby v. Johns-Manville Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1982
- Pan Oil & Gas Exploration, Inc. v. Kelt Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992