Legal Opinion

Cassio v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1901Published

Appeal from trial term, Kings county. Action by Antonio Cassio against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and an order denying a motion- for new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJerks, J.

The plaintiff gained a verdict for $200 damages for personal injuries, and this appeal is by the defendant from the judgment and order denying a new trial. In Kaare v. Iron Co., 139 N. Y. 369, 377, 34 N. E. 901, 903, the court say:

“But where there is a vast preponderance in the evidence in favor of the defendant, and the defense is supported by numerous witnesses apparently entitled to credit, either unsupported or slightly supported, the general term should exercise an independent judgment, and give the defendant appealing to it the full benefit which the law, by the right of appeal, intends…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaare v. Troy Steel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Moylan v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Colvin v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Harris v. Second Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Murphy v. Ninth Avenue RailroadThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API