Lowdermilk v. . Corpening
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ACTION, tried before Gilmer, Judge, at Fall Term, 1884, of Bueke Superior Court... There was a judgment for the plaintiffs and the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The controversy in this case is in respect to the plaintiff's claim of ownership of the land described in his complaint.' By consent, a trial by jury was waived and the court allowed to find the facts instead, it being agreed that in the event of the plaintiff's recovering judgment, his damages should be one hundred dollars.
The land formerly belonged to Archibald Kincaid, against whom judgments, on debts contracted previous to the adoption of the Constitution in 1868, were recovered and docketed in the Superior Court of Burke on January 4th, 1870. The land was sold under executions issued…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McDonald v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Hill v. . KesslerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- Burton v. . SpiersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Albright v. . AlbrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Long v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Vanstory v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Joyner v. Sugg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Ladd v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Vanstory v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.