Legal Opinion

Vanstory v. . Thornton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the same cause tried on demurrer, (110 N.C. 10). The demurrer having been overruled, the defendant put in an answer; and certain other persons, to wit, H.W. Lilly and R.T. Gray, executors of E.J. Lilly, W.P. Wemyess, H.W. Lilly and C.L. Bevil, (198) and W.A. Vanstory, all mentioned in the answer as mortgagees of defendant, Thornton's, homestead property, sought to be subjected to the plaintiff's debt, were, on their motion, allowed to come in and were made parties defendant, and adopted the answer of Thornton.

The following issues were submitted to the jury:

1. Is the plaintiff the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Citizens' National Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Markham v. W. H. Hicks & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Wilson v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Adrian v. . ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Fleming v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Harrison v. First Nat. Bank of LewisvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. In Re LoveUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
  4. Farris v. . HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API