Legal Opinion
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 6, 2017No. 13-4533 (L)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge:
On remand from the Supreme Court, we are tasked with determining “whether [New York’s General Business Law § ] 518 is a valid commercial speech regulation under Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 557, 100 S.Ct. 2343, 65 L.Ed.2d 341 (1980), and whether the law can be upheld as a valid disclosure requirement under Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626, 105 S.Ct. 2265, 85 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).” Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman (Expressions II), — U.S. -, 137…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ajdler v. Province of MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Expressions Hair Design v. SchneidermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Rowell v. PaxtonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2018
- American Hospital Association v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Manship v. TD Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.