Bracewell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of. dynamiting fish; from city court of Dublin— Judge Flynt. June 30, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtHarwell, J.
The defendant was charged, fointly with one Wynn, of dynamiting fish, and was found guilty. The evidence shows that the defendant suggested to Wynn that they go down to Turkey Creek and get a mess of fish, and together they went to the creek. Defendant was not seen to have any fishing tackle of any kind when he went to the creek. A large explosion was heard at the creek, and when witnesses who heard it arrived at its source they found the water muddy, dead fish floating on its surface, and saw the defendant and Wynn gathering in the fish. Wynn was in the water picking up fish, and the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- McQuire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- McQuire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933