McQuire v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
1. All who aid and abet in the commission of a misdemean- or, as well as those who immediately perpetrate it are principals. Southern Express Co. v. State, 6 Ga. App. 31 (64 S. E. 341); Bracewell v. State, 21 Ga. App. 133 (94 S. E. 91).
2. There is a legal rebuttable presumption that all the household effects, including any intoxicating liquors, belong to the head of the house. Baron v. State, 46 Ga. App. 829 (169 S. E. 323); Penney v. State, 43 Ga. App. 466 (159 S. E. 289).
3. Where the State relies for a conviction on circumstantial evidence alone, the proved facts must not only be consistent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Penney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Southern Express Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Bracewell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Moon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Voyles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Cline v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- McQuire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950