Legal Opinion

McQuire v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1950No. 33108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

1. All who aid and abet in the commission of a misdemean- or, as well as those who immediately perpetrate it are principals. Southern Express Co. v. State, 6 Ga. App. 31 (64 S. E. 341); Bracewell v. State, 21 Ga. App. 133 (94 S. E. 91).

2. There is a legal rebuttable presumption that all the household effects, including any intoxicating liquors, belong to the head of the house. Baron v. State, 46 Ga. App. 829 (169 S. E. 323); Penney v. State, 43 Ga. App. 466 (159 S. E. 289).

3. Where the State relies for a conviction on circumstantial evidence alone, the proved facts must not only be consistent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Penney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Southern Express Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Bracewell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Moon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Voyles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Cline v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. McQuire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API