Watts v. Sorenson
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLaymon, J.
This is an action by appellant to recover on a promissory note. To the complaint, which was in one paragraph, and in usual form, the appellees filed their answer in four paragraphs, being in substance as follows:(1) General denial; (2) no consideration; (3) consideration of note wholly failed; (4) execution of note was obtained by fraud.
To the last three paragraphs of this answer appellant filed his reply in two paragraphs in substance; (1) general denial; (2) a reply alleging a contract with various modifications and cancellations and showing the payment to appellant by appellees of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nipper v. Griffin Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Dailey, Exr. v. KunkelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Burwell v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonderman v. State Exchange Bank, RoannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975