Legal Opinion

Nipper v. Griffin Mercantile Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1923No. 14240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. While it is well settled that in order to invalidate a written contract on the ground of fraud, the fraud must have resulted in injury or damage, yet where, against an action upon a promissory note, the maker defends upon the ground that he was induced to execute and deliver it by misrepresentation of material facts, knowingly made by the payee in order to induce the making of the note, by which the maker was defrauded and deceived, the case is not one of fraud without damage, but the damage exists in the execution and delivery of the note by which the maker assumes an obligation. Holliday…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Enterprise Distributing Corp. v. ZalkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Marietta Fertilizer Co. v. BeckwithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Holliday & Co. v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Southwestern Railroad v. PapotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Daniels v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Crowell v. BrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Thompson v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Burwell v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API