Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Hosin

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1920No. Civ. No. 2216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.

This is an unusually frivolous appeal. The defendant, on motion, procured an order changing the place of trial from the county of San Joaquin to the county of Yuba, on the ground that he resides in the latter county. The appellants appeal from this order. The record is utterly barren of debatable questions. Only two points are made by the appellants.

[1] (1) It is claimed that the affidavit does not show affirmatively that the defendant was not a resident of the county of San Joaquin. But the code does not require this negative showing. Section 395 of the Code of Civil…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burt v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Stone v. EvertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API