Larimore v. Perfect, Admr.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKunkle, J.
The first ground of error urged by counsel for plaintiff in error relates to the court’s ruling in making the Industrial Commission of Ohio a party defendant in the case. Counsel claim that the Industrial Commission is neither an interested, a necessary nor a proper party.
The petition shows that the administrator of Abner E. Riddle rejected the claim for' the reason that there were no assets belonging to said decedent or his estate. We find among the papers in the case a stipulation signed by counsel as follows:
“It is stipulated by and between counsel for plaintiff and counsel for Industrial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Indust CommOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beach v. Union Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Kopp v. Torto, Exrx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
- Wegley v. SnyderOhio Court of Appeals · 1945