State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Indust Comm
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Syllabus by
JONES, J.
On October 14, 1924, Thompson, an employee in the service of an employer employing five or more workmen, but who had not complied with the workmen’s compensation law„ was injured. Upon his application for compensation the Industrial Commission found all the jurisdictional facts in applicant’s favor, including, the fact that the employee was in the service of an employer employing five or more workmen and at the same time found that Bonney was his employer; and on March 31, 1925, th'c commission made an award of compensation to Thompson. Being notified of the commission’s…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Ohio v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. Industrial Commission of Ohio.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Griffin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.