Legal Opinion
People v. Hall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the court erred in failing to strike defendant’s inculpatory statements to a police officer on the ground that they were not disclosed before trial pursuant to CPL 710.30 and 240.20. Because the contested statements were not the product of police questioning, but rather were spontaneous and voluntary, the People were not required to give notice to defendant of the statements pursuant to CPL 710.30 (see, People v DeBlase, 142 AD2d 926; People v McFadden, 126 AD2d 970, lv denied 69 NY2d 953). We agree, however, with defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. ElebyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. HerreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. DeBlaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Dombrowski-BoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. Van VleetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998