Legal Opinion
Newman v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1992No. C012164PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Real party in interest, California Highway Patrol (CHP), appeals from the judgment in an administrative mandamus proceeding setting aside a decision of the State Personnel Board (Board) which upheld plaintiff’s medical termination. The trial court concluded the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence and remanded to the Board for further proceedings. We shall modify that portion of the judgment remanding to the Board and otherwise affirm.
I
Plaintiff began working for CHP on a permanent basis in February 1986. In 1988, she was classified an Office…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- County of San Diego v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Carlton v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- California Youth Authority v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Edgerton v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.