Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kirkendall v. Department of the Army

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 7, 2007No. 2005-3077Published

1Dissent

BRYSON, Circuit Judge, with whom LOURIE, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges, join, and with whom SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges, join in part,

dissenting.*

I respectfully dissent as to both issues in this case. With respect to the first issue— whether equitable tolling may apply to the 15-day limitations period under the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 (“VEOA”), Pub.L. No. 105-339 — 1 join Judge Moore’s dissent. With respect to the second issue — whether a complainant has an automatic right to a hearing before the Merit Systems Protection Board under the Uniformed Services Employment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Sheehan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API