Legal Opinion

United States v. Juarez-Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2013No. 10-10370PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Guillermo Juarez-Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction for illegal entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Juarez-Rodriguez contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1) by failing to address him personally in a timely manner. He also contends that the district court violated Rule 11(b)(2) by failing to determine that his plea was voluntary and did not result from force, threats, or promises. We review for harmless…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Escamilla-RojasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Gilberto Aguilar-VeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James v. Peoria, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API