United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States & Canada v. Borden
Texas Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceSmith, Justice
In concurring with the majority opinion, I feel constrained to set down my views relative to the improper action of the trial court in sustaining petitioners’ plea in abatement and dismissing respondent’s cause of action. The writ in the present case was granted because of the tentative view that the case of Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Allen, Tex.Civ.App., 230 S.W.2d 325, wr. ref. certiorari denied 340 U.S. 934, 71 S.Ct. 501, 95 L.Ed. 674, rehearing denied 341 U.S. 906, 71 S.Ct. 611, 95 L.Ed. 1345, was controlling and required a dismissal of Borden’s suit. I do not agree with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williams v. WileyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Marchitto v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Dingwall v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Railway Employees of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Grogan Manufacturing Co. v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.