Legal Opinion

In re Hobson's Will

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from surrogate’s court, New York county. Modified. ° Proceedings for the settlement of the accounts of John L. Hobson, as administrator with the will annexed of Sarah M. Hobson, deceased. From the decree of the surrogate settling the accounts of the administrator, and from an order denying a motion to amend the account presented for settlement, the administrator and his surety appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The controversy, as it was presented to and decided by the surrogate, related to the liability of John L. Hobson, as administrator with the will annexed of Sarah M. Hobson, deceased, to account for the amount of a bond and mortgage payable to her, and collected by him after his appoint*372ment as administrator of her estate. The debt, as it was first created, seems to have been the property of George G. Hobson, the husband of Sarah M. Hobson, who were the parents of the administrator, John L. Hobson. On the 19th of May, 1866, George G. Hobson created a trust for the benefit of his wife during her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Valengin's Administrators v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Schluter v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Shumway v. CooperNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  4. In Re the Estate of HoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Caulkins v. . BoltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SharpNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of TaftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. In re the Estate of JacobsenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
  5. In re the Estate of ShafranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API