Legal Opinion
Boykin v. The Procter & Gamble Company
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 31, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00427Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RAH-NITA BOYKIN, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 1:23-cv-427 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : THE PROCTER & GAMBLE : COMPANY, : : Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Automotive air fresheners, like the Febreze Clips manufactured by Defendant The Proctor & Gamble Company (“P&G”), serve a practical purpose for drivers and passengers alike. Named Plaintiffs Rah-Nita Boykin, Delaney Jones, Brenda Keegan, Rasheeda Alexander, Mackenzie Gallagher, Fabjon Shehu, Toni Kellyghan, and Janna Jeansonne were enticed to buy…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.