Legal Opinion

Fox v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1955No. Nos. 33990 and 34018Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The principal question to be determined in both cases is: Where, in a hearing on a workmen’s compensation claim, a hypothetical question is propounded to a medical witness for the purpose of establishing causal connection between an accidental *573injury and succeeding harm or disability, may such question inquire as to “a causal relationship” or must it inquire as to “a direct or proximate causal relationship ” ?

As a preliminary, it is appropriate to set forth briefly the basis upon which compensation to injured employees is determined and allowed. Prior to the 1937 amendment of Section 1465-68,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  5. Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API