Fox v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The principal question to be determined in both cases is: Where, in a hearing on a workmen’s compensation claim, a hypothetical question is propounded to a medical witness for the purpose of establishing causal connection between an accidental *573injury and succeeding harm or disability, may such question inquire as to “a causal relationship” or must it inquire as to “a direct or proximate causal relationship ” ?
As a preliminary, it is appropriate to set forth briefly the basis upon which compensation to injured employees is determined and allowed. Prior to the 1937 amendment of Section 1465-68,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.