Legal Opinion

White v. Ragle

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1971No. 562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

This is a suit for a real estate broker’s commission based upon an exclusive listing contract which was subsequently revoked. White recovered a judgment, and Ragle appeals.

We affirm.

Ragle’s appeal is based upon alleged error in the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Ragle makes the following claims of error on appeal, (1) that White’s exclusive listing contract was not coupled with an interest, was not partially performed and was revocable at will; (2) that White was not the procuring cause of the sale; and (3) that there was an accord and satisfaction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Shufflebarger & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hutchinson v. Dobson-Bainbridge Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  3. Miller v. Prince Street Elevator Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Marchiondo v. ScheckNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Levander v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reinhart v. Rauscher Pierce Securities Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Talley v. Security Service Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Clodfelter v. Plaza Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API