Legal Opinion

Carsten v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1976No. 11702PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINANS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment to defendant, Aetna Life Insurance Company. Plaintiff, Guy Carsten, alleges error because a genuine issue of material fact exists that prevents entry of judgment as a matter of law. We agree.

We examine the evidence, as we must, in a light most favorable to the non-moving party. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Co., 1968, 83 S.D. 207, 157 N.W.2d 19. On March 1, 1968 Aetna issued a group policy (# 58520) to C. P. Clare & Co., Rapid City, South Dakota. On February 10,1969, plaintiffs wife was employed by C. P. Clare and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Automobile Casualty Underwriters v. RuotsalainenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BechardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Pomerenke v. National Life & Accident InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Bayer v. Lutheran Mutual Life Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API