Legal Opinion
Perry v. H.O. Perry & Son Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 2, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Clinton Perry, Angela Perry, and Andrew N. Grant appeal from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) in favor of H.O. Perry & Son Co. (H.O. Perry) on their complaint seeking damages for alleged negligent misrepresentations by H.O. Perry. 1 Grant claims that he suffered a pecuniary loss as a result of his reliance on the advice given to him by his insurance agent, H.O. Perry, advice he claims adversely impacted his liability insurance coverage for an accident involving the Perrys for which he is liable. We disagree and affirm the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chapman v. RideoutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Jacques v. Pioneer Plastics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Van Houten v. Harco Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Maine Mutual Fire Insurance v. GrantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Desfosses v. NotisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
3Cited by13 opinions
- Curtis v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Rand v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Pollack v. Regional School Unit 75Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- State v. HughesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.