Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Rideout

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 16, 1990PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Arthur Rideout appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Penob-scot County, Beaulieu, J.) entered in favor of plaintiffs Dale and Kristine Chapman. After a non-jury trial, the court awarded damages for negligent misrepresentation. On appeal, defendant argues that the tort of negligent misrepresentation has never been recognized in Maine and that therefore the trial justice erred in finding for plaintiffs on the issue of liability. We affirm the judgment.

The facts may be briefly summarized as follows: In 1985, defendant acquired a parcel of land in Holden. In…

2Cited by45 opinions

  1. Century 21 Balfour Real Estate v. MennaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Veilleux v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Diversified Foods, Inc. v. First National Bank of BostonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Guiggey v. BombardierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API