Flores v. Federici
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
The question presented on appeal is whether petitioner, a justice of the peace, charged with having violated the provisions of Section 36-20-2, N.M.S.A., 1953 Compilation, while in office, is entitled to the right of trial by jury. The section under which the petitioner was charged and the penalty statute, § 36-20-3, read:
Section 36-20-2.
“No justice of the peace or constable shall directly or indirectly, buy or be interested in buying any bond, note or other demand, evidence of indebtedness or cause of action, for the purpose of commencing any suit thereon before a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Farmer v. LoofbourrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Hamilton v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Hammond v. 8th Jud. Dist. Ct., N.M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. District Court of McKinley CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Anaya v. ScarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Sender v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Maloney v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Sender v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.