Application of Malcolm
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the examiner in his rejection of claims 1 to 5, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent on new and useful improvements in valve apparatus and the seating means therefor.
None of appellant’s claims was allowed and all of them were finally rejected on the disclosures, singly or in combination, of the following references: Murray 1,732,241 Oct. 22, 1929; Malcolm 1,778,765 Oct. 21, 1930; Malcolm 2,131,710 Sept. 27, 1938; Malcolm 2,188,137 Jan. 23, 1940;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Application of De VaneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- In re CoeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re ChristensenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Application of KrukovskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950