Legal Opinion

In Re Neal

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2003No. 26,782PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

{1} This matter came before the Court following disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to the Rules Governing Discipline, Rules 17-101 through 17-316 NMRA. In those proceedings, respondent Drew Alan Neal was found to have committed multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rules 16-101 through 16-805 NMRA. Intertwined with the current disciplinary matter was respondent’s failure to comply with conditions for deferral of a two-year period of suspension imposed in a previous disciplinary case. We adopt the recommendation of the disciplinary board that Drew Alan Neal…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beit v. PROBATE & FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENTMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. In Re SpruellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BashorWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Matter of SchmidtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Victor Marshall (I)New Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
  2. In re VenieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In re VenieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API