Legal Opinion
Smith v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1938No. 16949PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant insurance company complains, by application for rehearing, that we erred in remanding this matter for the hearing of further evidence.
It is contended that our refusal to accept the testimony of Mr. Keetch is not justified since the policy sued upon provides that the computations of the surrender values stated in the schedules are based upon the actuaries or combined experience table of mortality. From this premise, it is asserted that the calculations of Mr. Keetch have been figured by use of that table.
We have carefully reviewed the testimony of the expert and are still of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Turner v. Peoples Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Darby v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dawson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Standard Industrial L. Ins. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
- Townley v. PomesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Williams v. Peoples Industrial Life Ins. Co. of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Smith v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940