Galindo v. Roach
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, from an order allowing an amendment of a cost-bill, and from an order taxing costs. Joseph P. J ones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This action was brought to recover money due for rent under the terms of a lease. A verdict was - returned and a judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor for five hundred dollars and costs on the twenty-first day of January, 1897. A cost-bill was filed by plaintiff on the twenty-fifth day of the same month, claiming costs in an aggregate amount of four hundred and eleven dollars and thirty-nine cents. On the twentieth day of February, 1897, defendant’s motion to tax costs came regularly on for hearing, and after the taking of some testimony was continued to the 24th of the same…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapin & Mastick v. BroderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Dow v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hotchkiss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Riddell v. HarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griffith v. Welbanks & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Ferry v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Legg & Shaw Co. v. WorthingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Belaval v. Fajardo Sugar Growers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
- Belaval v. Fajardo Sugar Growers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912