Legal Opinion

EUCLID v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 2024No. 2:23-cv-04335Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATHANIEL EUCLID, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-CV-4335 : TRANSPORTATION SECURITY : ADMINISTRATION, , : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM Nathaniel Euclid alleges that agents of the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) opened his luggage and stole valuable Pokémon cards. TSA moves to dismiss his Complaint, and I will do so. In addition, because there doesn’t appear to be a way for Mr. Euclid to fix the problems with his claims, I will dismiss the case with prejudice in part and without prejudice in part,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Steven Vogt v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  5. Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API