Legal Opinion

Noy Haynes v. James H. Carr, Inc., and Pacific Lumber Inspection Bureau

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1970No. 13701_1PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises two issues: first, whether Noy Haynes’ tort action against James H. Carr Company is barred by Virginia’s Workmen’s Compensation Act; and second, whether the district court acquired personal jurisdiction over Pacific Lumber Inspection Bureau under Virginia’s long arm statute. The district judge, applying Virginia law because jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, held for Carr and the Inspection Bureau. We affirm his dismissal of the action.

I

Haynes, a carpenter employed by Earl M. Childrey, Inc., was injured by the collapse of a roof truss…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Burroughs v. Walmont, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. MeeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Rea, Administratrix v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  5. Bosher v. JamersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Columbia Briargate Company, a Limited Partnership v. First National Bank in Dallas Vaughn Pearson and A.S. Kyzer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida JohnsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Peanut Corporation of America, International Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Hollywood Brands, Inc., Consolidated Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. McLaughlin v. CopelandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
  5. Harris v. VAO Intourist, MoscowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API