Legal Opinion

HINES v. JOHNSON

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided February 9, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00515Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ARIS HINES and ) BRANDI THOMASON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 1:19CV515 ) TERRY S. JOHNSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Party Defendants. (Docket Entry 16.) For the following reasons, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiffs’ motion be granted to the extent described below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs’ original complaint raised twelve causes of action against Defendants…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Kathleen A. Shanaghan v. John D. Cahill Cahill & Associates, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API