Legal Opinion

Hall v. DE WELD MICA CORPORATION

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1956No. 306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant demurs on the ground of a misjoinder of parties and causes. When a demurrer on that ground is overruled, Rule 4(a) Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 243 N.C. 766, does not apply.

The defendant contends that there is a misjoinder of parties and causes, because the plaintiffs seek to recover damages and pray for a permanent injunction for: “(1) trespass on their property; (2) labor in keeping things clean; (3) exposure to silicosis; and (4) fear and mental anguish for threat to their health and their children.” The defendant further states in its brief: “As to their labor,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. West v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Lee v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Gwaltney v. Scottish Carolina Timber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lubin v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Hoffman v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  3. Whitehead ex rel. Whitehead v. MargelDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API