Legal Opinion

Lee v. . Stewart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNhill, J.

An invasion of the close of another . . . constitutes a trespass. 26 R. C. L., 939. An entry on land in the peaceable possession of another is deemed a trespass, without regard to the amount of force used. Neither the form of instrumentality by which the close is broken nor the extent of the damages is material. 26 R. C. L., 938. Thus every unauthorized, and therefore unlawful, entry into the close of another, is a trespass. Dougherty v. Stepp, 18 N. C., 371; Brame v. Clark, 148 N. C., 364; Frisbee v. Marshall, 122 N. C., 760.

Where a trespass is shown the party aggrieved is entitled at least…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Hutton & Bourbonnais, Inc. v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Brame v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Dougherty v. . SteppSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1835
  5. Frisbee v. Town of MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Snow v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Smith v. VonCannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. York Industrial Center, Inc. v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. ClyburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API